Consumption, Risk and Prioritarianism
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we study consumption decisions under risk assuming a prioritarian social welfare function, namely a concave transformation of individual utility functions. Under standard assumptions, there is always more current consumption under ex ante prioritarianism than under utilitarianism. Thus, a concern for equity (in the ex ante prioritarian sense) means less concern for the risky future. In contrast, there is usually less current consumption under ex post prioritarianism than under utilitarianism. We discuss the robustness of these results to learning, and to other forms of prioritarian social welfare functions.
منابع مشابه
Utilitarianism, prioritarianism, and intergenerational equity: A cake eating model
We use a simple consumption model, the so-called cake eating model, to study the interaction of equity, time and risk in social decision making. Total consumption, the “cake,” is uncertain. The social planner allocates consumption between two agents (representing two generations), by assigning the first a determinate amount, with the second receiving the risky remainder. We study this consumpti...
متن کاملFOR ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY SOLUTIONS and the DUKE UNIVERSITY ENERGY INITIATIVE Consumption , Risk
In this paper, we study consumption decisions under risk assuming a prioritarian social welfare function, namely a concave transformation of individual utility functions. Under standard assumptions, there is always more current consumption under ex ante prioritarianism than under utilitarianism. Thus, a concern for equity (in the ex ante prioritarian sense) means less concern for the risky futu...
متن کاملPrioritarianism and Climate Change
Prioritarianism is the ethical view that gives greater weight to well-being changes affecting individuals at lower well-being levels. This view is influential both in moral philosophy, and in theoretical work on social choice—where it is captured by a social welfare function (“SWF”) summing a concave transformation of individual well-being numbers. However, prioritarianism has largely been igno...
متن کاملIn Defence of the Priority
In their paper 'Why It Matters That Some Are Worse Off Than Others: An Argument against the Priority View', Michael Otsuka and Alex Voorhoeve argue that prioritarianism is mistaken. I argue that their case against prioritarianism has much weaker foundations than it might at first seem. Their key argument is based on the claim that prioritarianism ignores the fact of the 'separateness of persons...
متن کاملEquality-Tempered Prioritarianism
According to prioritarianism, the only thing that improves a state of affairs is improvements in well-being. In this, prioritarianism agrees with many traditional axiologies, including classical utilitarianism. Distinctive about prioritarianism, however, is its weighting. Simply put, all welfare benefits improve a state of affairs, but benefits to worse-off persons improve states of affairs mor...
متن کامل